Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5 Nano
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5 Nano: side by side
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5 Nano | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 57.3 | 26.8 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Output speed | 51 t/s | 170 t/s | GPT-5 Nano |
| Output price | $25.00/1M | $0.40/1M | GPT-5 Nano |
| Context | 1000K | 400K | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI | Tie |
Claude Opus 4.7
Pros
- +Handles very large contexts effectively
- +Strong reasoning and writing quality
- +Versatile with text, image, and file inputs
- +Careful and safety-aligned responses
Cons
- –Can be overly cautious or refuse edge cases
- –Higher latency on complex multimodal tasks
- –No native real-time web access
GPT-5 Nano
Pros
- +Handles very large contexts efficiently
- +Supports text, image, and file inputs
- +Lightweight design for faster responses
- +Practical for extended document tasks
Cons
- –Lower capability depth than full-scale models
- –May struggle with highly complex reasoning
- –Trade-off in advanced task performance
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5 Nano are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.