Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-4.1 Mini
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-4.1 Mini: side by side
| Spec | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-4.1 Mini | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 27 | 16.3 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
| Output speed | 129 t/s | 80 t/s | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
| Output price | $10.00/1M | $1.60/1M | GPT-4.1 Mini |
| Context | 1049K | 1048K | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | OpenAI | Tie |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Pros
- +Very large context window for extended inputs
- +Native support for multiple modalities in one model
- +Strong integration of text with visual and audio data
Cons
- –Higher latency on very large multimodal inputs
- –Performance can vary with extremely long contexts
- –Dependent on Google infrastructure for access
GPT-4.1 Mini
Pros
- +Handles over one million tokens of context
- +Processes images, text, and files together
- +Suitable for large document workflows
Cons
- –Mini variant may trade depth for efficiency
- –No audio or video modality support
- –Large context can increase response latency
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-4.1 Mini are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.