Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5: side by side
| Spec | Llama 4 Maverick | GPT-5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 14.3 | 15.3 | GPT-5 |
| Output speed | 94 t/s | 167 t/s | GPT-5 |
| Output price | $0.60/1M | $10.00/1M | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Context | 1049K | 400K | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI | Tie |
Llama 4 Maverick
Pros
- +Very large 1M token context window
- +Native multimodal support for text and images
- +Open weights from Meta
Cons
- –High compute requirements for full context
- –Limited to text and image modalities
- –Potential for hallucinations on complex tasks
GPT-5
Pros
- +Very large context window
- +Native multimodal input support
- +Seamless text-image-file integration
Cons
- –Hypothetical model with unverified performance
- –High resource demands for maximum context
- –Potential latency on large multimodal tasks
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Llama 4 Maverick and GPT-5 are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.