Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4: side by side
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 53.5 | 51.4 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Output speed | 50 t/s | 147 t/s | GPT-5.4 |
| Output price | $25.00/1M | $15.00/1M | GPT-5.4 |
| Context | 1000K | 1050K | GPT-5.4 |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI | Tie |
Claude Opus 4.7
Pros
- +Handles very large contexts effectively
- +Strong reasoning and writing quality
- +Versatile with text, image, and file inputs
Cons
- –Can be overly cautious or refuse edge cases
- –Higher latency on complex multimodal tasks
- –No native real-time web access
GPT-5.4
Pros
- +Handles extremely large contexts
- +Seamless text-image-file integration
- +Strong at document-level tasks
Cons
- –No native audio or video support
- –Large context can increase latency
- –May need careful prompting for complex tasks
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.4 are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.